Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85084
Appellant, vs.
THE MARTIN CONDOMINIUM UNIT FILED
OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A
DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT,
Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment and possibly from an order “Granting In Part, And Denying In Part, The Martin Condominium Unit Owners Association’s Motion For (1) Pre-Filing Order Against Plaintiffs Pursuant To Nevada’s Vexatious Litigant Standard And (2) An Award Of Attorney’s Fees And Costs Resulting From Plaintiffs’ Ongoing Vexatious Conduct.” Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion was formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4).
Supreme Court
OF
NEVADA (0) (957A eGR 22-24FII
Accordingly the notice of appeal was prematurely filed; this court lacks jurisdiction, and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
5 Los , od.
Silver (opp.
Cadish
Prebyr vi J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge
Wesley Rusch
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
Supreme Court
OF
NEVADA tO) LO47A > 2
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.