Nevada Supreme Court, 2022

Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N

Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided August 8, 2022

Rusch v. The Martin Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'N

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85084 Appellant, vs. THE MARTIN CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A FILE DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT, AUG 0 8 2022 Res • ondent. A. BROWN 'UPREME COU T ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order granting respondent's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment and possibly from an order "Granting In Part, And Denying In Part, The Martin Condominium Unit Owners Association's Motion For (1) Pre-Filing Order Against Plaintiffs Pursuant To Nevada's Vexatious Litigant Standard And (2) An Award Of Attorney's Fees And Costs Resulting From Plaintiffs' Ongoing Vexatious Conduct." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion was formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1.0) 194 7A Accordingly the notice of appeal was prematurely filed; this court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. J. Silver . 1 J. Cadish J. cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Wesley Rusch Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) t447A 42§1TD 2

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85084 Appellant, vs. THE MARTIN CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A FILE DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT, AUG 0 8 2022 Res • ondent.

A. BROWN 'UPREME COU T

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order granting respondent's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment and possibly from an order "Granting In Part, And Denying In Part, The Martin Condominium Unit Owners Association's Motion For (1) Pre-Filing Order Against Plaintiffs Pursuant To Nevada's Vexatious Litigant Standard And (2) An Award Of Attorney's Fees And Costs Resulting From Plaintiffs' Ongoing Vexatious Conduct." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion was formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

1.0) 194 7A Accordingly the notice of appeal was prematurely filed; this court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Silver .

1 J.

Cadish

J.

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Wesley Rusch Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) t447A 42§1TD 2

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WESLEY RUSCH, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85084 Appellant, vs. THE MARTIN CONDOMINIUM UNIT FILED OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT, Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment and possibly from an order “Granting In Part, And Denying In Part, The Martin Condominium Unit Owners Association’s Motion For (1) Pre-Filing Order Against Plaintiffs Pursuant To Nevada’s Vexatious Litigant Standard And (2) An Award Of Attorney’s Fees And Costs Resulting From Plaintiffs’ Ongoing Vexatious Conduct.” Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion was formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). Supreme Court OF NEVADA (0) (957A eGR 22-24FII Accordingly the notice of appeal was prematurely filed; this court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 5 Los , od. Silver (opp. Cadish Prebyr vi J. Pickering cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Wesley Rusch Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk Supreme Court OF NEVADA tO) LO47A > 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.