Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye

Nevada Supreme Court

Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DANIEL DAV1D DYDZAK, No. 84868 Appellant, vs. TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE; JORGE NAVARRETE; THOMAS LAYTON, NI= r A/K/A TOM LAYTON; CHARLES SCHWAB; DONALD F. MILES; SEP 0 1 2022 JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON; BARRY G. EUZABET SILVERMAN; WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; cL PETER LIND SHAW; RONALD M. GEORGE; ERIC M. GEORGE; ALAN I. ROTHENBERG; 1ST CENTURY BANK; 1ST CENTURY BACSHARES, INC.; EDWARD EPHRAIM SCHIFFER; SIDNEY R. THOMAS; WILLIAM DATO; MAXINE M. CHESNEY; MOLLY C. DWYER; GEORGE H. KING; A. WALLACE TASHIMA; FERDINAND FRANCIS FERNANDEZ; KIM MCCLANE WARDLAW; WILLIAM C. CANBY; RONALD M. GOULD; AND RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Respondents. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. Initial review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the challenged order is not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). "[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs." Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA •,,, r.:7A 2:1_ sod 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). The challenged order grants a motion to dismiss filed by two defendants and does not appear to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. It also appears that appellant's claims against the other defendants remain pending in the district court. And it does not appear that any other statute or court rule allows an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, as it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. ‘4.1Z4LeAD Silver , J. , J. J. Cadish Pickering SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1 ,147A cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Daniel David Dydzak 1st Century Bacshares, Inc. 1st Century Bank A. Wallace Tashima Alan I. Rothenberg Barry G. Silverman Charles Schwab Donald F. Miles Edward Ephraim Schiffer Eric M. George Ferdinand Francis Fernandez George H. King Johnnie B. Rawlinson Kim McClane Wardlaw Maxine M. Chesney Molly C. Dwyer Peter Lind Shaw Richard C. Tallman Ronald M. George Ronald M. Gould Sidney R. Thomas Olson, Cannon, Gormley, & Stoberski Thomas Layton William A. Fletcher William C. Canby William Dato Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVAQA 1, 17A 3

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DANIEL DAV1D DYDZAK, No. 84868 Appellant, vs. TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE; JORGE NAVARRETE; THOMAS LAYTON, NI= r

A/K/A TOM LAYTON; CHARLES SCHWAB; DONALD F. MILES; SEP 0 1 2022 JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON; BARRY G. EUZABET SILVERMAN; WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; cL

PETER LIND SHAW; RONALD M. GEORGE; ERIC M. GEORGE; ALAN I. ROTHENBERG; 1ST CENTURY BANK; 1ST CENTURY BACSHARES, INC.; EDWARD EPHRAIM SCHIFFER; SIDNEY R. THOMAS; WILLIAM DATO; MAXINE M. CHESNEY; MOLLY C. DWYER; GEORGE H. KING; A. WALLACE TASHIMA; FERDINAND FRANCIS FERNANDEZ; KIM MCCLANE WARDLAW; WILLIAM C. CANBY; RONALD M. GOULD; AND RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. Initial review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the challenged order is not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). "[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs." Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

•,,, r.:7A 2:1_ sod 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). The challenged order grants a motion to dismiss filed by two defendants and does not appear to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. It also appears that appellant's claims against the other defendants remain pending in the district court. And it does not appear that any other statute or court rule allows an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, as it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

‘4.1Z4LeAD Silver , J.

, J. J. Cadish Pickering

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

1 ,147A cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Daniel David Dydzak 1st Century Bacshares, Inc. 1st Century Bank A. Wallace Tashima Alan I. Rothenberg Barry G. Silverman Charles Schwab Donald F. Miles Edward Ephraim Schiffer Eric M. George Ferdinand Francis Fernandez George H. King Johnnie B. Rawlinson Kim McClane Wardlaw Maxine M. Chesney Molly C. Dwyer Peter Lind Shaw Richard C. Tallman Ronald M. George Ronald M. Gould Sidney R. Thomas Olson, Cannon, Gormley, & Stoberski Thomas Layton William A. Fletcher William C. Canby William Dato Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVAQA

1, 17A 3

Reference

Status
Published