Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TULY LEPOLO, No. 83755 Petitioner,

vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL r VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE

LED

HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SEP 07 2022 SENIOR DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN

CLERK QF SUPREME COURT Respondents, By oY Oly DEPUTY CLERK and

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging petitioner's pretrial custody status.

Keal party in interest has filed a motion to dismiss this petition as moot because petitioner has now been tried by a jury and convicted. Because any issue regarding petitioner’s pretrial custody status has been rendered moot, real party in interest’s motion 1s granted. This petition is dismissed, and the oral argument scheduled for September 9, 2022, is

SupREME Court OF NEvabA

(0) 194TA RIE na “a E037

Supreme Court oF Nevapa

(0) 1U7A eS

vacated. Petitioner's motion to appear via video at oral argument is denied as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

pAe eck, J. Mood JJ.

Hardesty Stiglich J. AS Cryer J. Cadish Silver Prekorirp 5 A—— ; Pickering ) Herndon

cc: Chief Judge, The Kighth Judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior Judge Department 17, District Judge Yampolsky & Margolis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Reference

Status
Published