Mereora v. Dist. Ct. (Slc Llc)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LARISA MEREORA, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 84967 THOMAS MULKINS, AN INDIVIDUAL;

NINA GROZAV, AN INDIVIDUAL; ION

NEAGU, AN INDIVIDUAL; ALISA

NEAUGU, AN INDIVIDUAL; MARIA

REYNOLDS, AN INDIVIDUAL; NNG

LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

FILE COMPANY, D/B/A UNIVERSAL SEP 9 5 2022 MOTORCARS; AND UNIVERSAL k BROWN MOTORCAR LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED PROVE COURT LIABILITY COMPANY, D/B/A CLERK UNIVERSAL MOTORCARS,

Petitioners, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents, and

SLC LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges district court orders denying motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. Having considered the petition and its documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) I 947A <0. z -zscAz that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying summary judgment or motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rules applies here. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. u. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197-98, 179 P.3d 556, 558-59 (2008) (discussing writ petitions challenging denials of motions to dismiss); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (discussing writ petitions challenging denials of summary judgment); see also Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 678, 684, 476 P.3d 1194, 1199 (2020) (declining to provide writ relief when the underlying issue involved factual disputes). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'

-c 216°‘ , C.J.

Parraguirre

Cadish at*, ,J , Sr.J.

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge

Hofland & Tomsheck

Enenstein Pham & Glass/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk

'The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA ((1) 1447A