Nevada Supreme Court, 2022

Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 7, 2022 · No. 83755
Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TULY LEPOLO, No. 83755 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL FILED VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE

HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SFP 0 7 2022 SENIOR :DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKX SUIREME COURT Respondents, BY •v DEPUTY CLERK and

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

OR.DER DISMISSING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging petitioner's pretrial custody status.

Real party in interest has filed a motion to dismiss this petition as moot because petitioner has now been tried by a jury and convicted. Because any issue regarding petitioner's pretrial custody status has been rendered moot, real party in interest's motion is granted. This petition is dismissed, and the oral argument scheduled for September 9, 2022, is SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

10) I 947A „V, -?-8-C)37 vacated. Petitioner's motion to appear via video at oral argument is denied as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

J. Al eabG,t,-0 J. Hardesty Stiglich

Cadish Silver

Pickering Herndon cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior judge

Department 1.7, District Judge

Yarnpolsky & Margolis

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

10) I947A GiS*,

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.