Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TULY LEPOLO, No. 83755 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL FILED VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE
HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SFP 0 7 2022 SENIOR :DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKX SUIREME COURT Respondents, BY •v DEPUTY CLERK and
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Real Party in Interest.
OR.DER DISMISSING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging petitioner's pretrial custody status.
Real party in interest has filed a motion to dismiss this petition as moot because petitioner has now been tried by a jury and convicted. Because any issue regarding petitioner's pretrial custody status has been rendered moot, real party in interest's motion is granted. This petition is dismissed, and the oral argument scheduled for September 9, 2022, is SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
10) I 947A „V, -?-8-C)37 vacated. Petitioner's motion to appear via video at oral argument is denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
Parraguirre
J. Al eabG,t,-0 J. Hardesty Stiglich
Cadish Silver
Pickering Herndon cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior judge
Department 1.7, District Judge
Yarnpolsky & Margolis
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
10) I947A GiS*,
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.