Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Lepolo (Tuly) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TULY LEPOLO, No. 83755 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL FILED VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SFP 0 7 2022 SENIOR :DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKX SUIREME COURT Respondents, BY •v DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest. OR.DER DISMISSING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging petitioner's pretrial custody status. Real party in interest has filed a motion to dismiss this petition as moot because petitioner has now been tried by a jury and convicted. Because any issue regarding petitioner's pretrial custody status has been rendered moot, real party in interest's motion is granted. This petition is dismissed, and the oral argument scheduled for September 9, 2022, is SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10) I 947A „V, -?-8-C)37 vacated. Petitioner's motion to appear via video at oral argument is denied as moot. It is so ORDERED. Parraguirre J. Al eabG,t,-0 J. Hardesty Stiglich Cadish Silver Pickering Herndon cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior judge Department 1.7, District Judge Yarnpolsky & Margolis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) I947A GiS*,

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TULY LEPOLO, No. 83755 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL FILED VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SFP 0 7 2022 SENIOR :DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKX SUIREME COURT Respondents, BY •v DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

OR.DER DISMISSING PETITION

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging petitioner's pretrial custody status. Real party in interest has filed a motion to dismiss this petition as moot because petitioner has now been tried by a jury and convicted. Because any issue regarding petitioner's pretrial custody status has been rendered moot, real party in interest's motion is granted. This petition is dismissed, and the oral argument scheduled for September 9, 2022, is SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

10) I 947A „V, -?-8-C)37 vacated. Petitioner's motion to appear via video at oral argument is denied as moot. It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

J. Al eabG,t,-0 J. Hardesty Stiglich

Cadish Silver

Pickering Herndon

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior judge Department 1.7, District Judge Yarnpolsky & Margolis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 10) I947A GiS*,

Reference

Status
Published