Blandino (Kim) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

SupRemMe Court atin [4B

Nevapa

OF rN <TR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KIM DENNIS BLANDINO, No. 85461

Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, el eD

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF Oo

CLARK; THE HONORABLE OCT 24 20zz

MICHELLE LEAVITT, DISTRICT

JUDGE; LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT;

AND JOSEPH S. SCISCENTO,

Respondents, and

THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND

JOSEPH LOMBARDO, SHERIFF,

Real Parties in Interest.

ELIZ/SETH A. BROAN

LE JF SUIPREAMG COURT _ {eae

CAERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT RELIEF This pro se original petition for extraordinary writ relief challenges various aspects of justice court and district court criminal proceedings.

Whether to issue extraordinary writ relief is solely within this court’s discretion, Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and it is petitioner’s burden to demonstrate that such relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). One aspect of this burden requires that petitioners provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition. NRAP 21(a)(4). Another requires that petitioners provide proof of service on the court and parties. NRAP 21{a)(1). Having

22-321g | considered this petition in light of these standards, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

Stiglich cc: Joseph S. Sciscento, Justice of the Peace

Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge

Kim Dennis Blandino

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

Supreme Court or

NEVADA

WO MER aS