Supreme Court OF NEVADA

(O) [7A BEBE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JESUS LUIS AREVALO, No. 85169 Appellant, vs. CATHERINE MARIE AREVALO, N/K/A ie Hl f E DB CATHERINE MARIE DELAO, Respondent. OCT 24 2022 aie psn BY DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a post-divorce decree district court order directing (1) appellant to obtain a life insurance policy, (2) that an indemnification QDRO will not be entered if appellant obtains the required life insurance, (3) counsel for respondent to notify the court if a compliant life insurance policy is obtained, and (4) that if appellant fails to timely obtain life insurance, the indemnification QDRO shall be submitted to the court for signature. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order challenged on appeal does not appear to be substantively appealable. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule”). In particular, the order does not appear appealable as a special order after final judgment because it relates to the mere enforcement of a prior district court order.

See Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 59, P.3d 1220 (2002) (recognizing that

22-83346

Supreme Court OF NEvADA

(Oy PUSTA eSB

a post-judgment order must affect rights growing out of the final judgment

to be appealable). Accordingly, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction

and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. / A. Law, od. Hardesty ‘ Aho. val. A Jd. Stiglich e Herndon

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Jesus Luis Arevalo Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk