Monsef v. Canyon Willow Pecos Owners' Ass'N

Nevada Supreme Court

Monsef v. Canyon Willow Pecos Owners' Ass'N

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STANLEY MONSEF, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85543 Appellant, vs. FIL CANYON WILLOW PECOS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NON- NOV 1 7 2022 PROFIT CORPORATION, E OWN CLERi Su ZURT Res • ondent. DEPUPir 'LERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order regarding attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was prematurely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears it was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion was formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See AA Primo Builders v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010); NRAP 4(a)(4). This court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

AaeLe4.4 J. ,J. Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A aze4s> 22,- apt cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Stanley Monsef Marquis Aurbach Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 0MA aG,A:tm

Reference

Status
Published