Rothschild v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
Upon reference to rule 35 of the General Rules of Practice it will be seen that at the time that the appellant’s attorney procured the order to file the case from the judge who settled the same, his right so to do had become lost because of his failure to have the case signed by the judge and filed within ten days after it had been settled—the rule providing that in case this is not done the case shall be deemed abandoned' unless the time is extended by order. It was, therefore, the duty of the attorney, finding that he could not get his case filed within the ten days provided by the rule, to have procured an
There seeming to be so general a misapprehension of the force of this rule amongst members of the bar, this court has not deemed it proper under the circumstances to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal, but thinks that the appellant should have an opportunity to be relieved from his default and get his case regularly filed.
The motion to dismiss should, therefore, be denied upon payment of ten dollars costs of this motion.
Present — Yah Brunt, P. J., Williams, Patterson, O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ.
Motion denied upon payment of ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.