Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

McMahon v. New York Elevated Railroad

McMahon v. New York Elevated Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 6, 1896
37 N.Y.S. 958; 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 578 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. O. Nichols, for appellants., Adam Wiener, for respondent.

McMahon v. New York Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are all of opinion that the evidence in this case is entirely insufficient to sustain the report and judgment. A new trial must be awarded, because there is nothing in the record which would justify a modification. The testimony is too slight to enable the court to reduce the awards to any fixed sum. The case was tried seemingly without appreciation of the necessity for proper and adequate proof such as is required in all these cases. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered before another referee, to be appointed by the court, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.