Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

In re Morgan's Estate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 20, 1896 · Ingraham, Patterson

38 N.Y.S. 378; 74 N.Y. St. Rep. 34; 2 A.D. 619 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George L. Rives, for appellants., Jabish Holmes, Jr., and Edgar J. Levey, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, J.

The questions in this case are the same as those in Re Whiting (decided herewith) 38 N. Y. Supp. 131. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

*379WILLIAMS and O’BRIEN, JJ„ concur.

Dissenting Opinion

INGRAHAM, J. (dissenting).

The question presented is discussed in the case of In re Whiting (decided herewith) 38 N. Y. Supp. 131, and the views that I then expressed would lead to a reversal of this order. I therefore dissent from the conclusion arrived at by the court.

VAN BRUNT, P. J„ concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.