Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

Maher v. Garry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 10, 1896 · Williams

38 N.Y.S. 448; 3 A.D. 480; 74 N.Y. St. Rep. 72 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frederic R. Kellogg, for appellants., Samuel Untermyer, for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, J.

We have heard the appeal from the judgment in this case at the present term (38 N. Y. Supp. 436), and have felt constrained to affirm such judgment. We have thus become familiar *449with all the facts, and, in view of the great hardship to the plaintiffs resulting from the judgment, we think there should be no additional allowance granted.

The order should therefore be reversed, but without costs of the appeal, and the motion should be denied, without costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.