Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad

Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 25, 1896
39 N.Y.S. 1127 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William W. Goodrich, for appellant. Charles J. Patterson, for respondent.

Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There are no good exceptions in this record. We cannot reverse the judgment on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence; for, even if the testimony of the South Carolina witness, which is so severely criticised, be left out of consideration, there is quite enough to sustain the finding of negligence. The case was one in which the jury might have found either way, according to their view of the credibility of the witnesses; and where there is such a conflict of proof their determination of the issues of fact must be allowed to stand, in the absence of legal error calling for a reversal. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.