Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

Weber v. Forgotston

Weber v. Forgotston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 5, 1896
39 N.Y.S. 1135 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. C. De la Maro, for appellant. W. J. Lippman, for respondent.

Weber v. Forgotston

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

So far as the questions of law are concerned, they are disposed of by the case of Palmer v. Jones, 69 Hun, 240, 23 N. Y. Supp. 584. So far as the facts are concerned, we entirely agree with the conclusion reached by the justice at the special term. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.