Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co.
Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co.
40 N.Y.S. 1141
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The moving papers of the junior attaching creditor fail to show that the summons in his action against the defendant had been served or published within the 30 days required by law, and that was necessary under the decision in the case of Ladenburg v. Bank, 2 App. Div. 477, 37 N. Y. Supp. 1085. The order vacating the plaintiff’s attachment must therefore be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with §10 costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.