Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

Commercial Bank v. Foltz

Commercial Bank v. Foltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 16, 1896
41 N.Y.S. 183; 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 631; 9 A.D. 630 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John Van Voorhis, for appellants., Edward Harris, for respondent.

Commercial Bank v. Foltz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It having been conceded on the argument of these appeals that the issues of fact settled by the special term have been tried before a jury, and determined in favor of the plaintiff; that the trial has been completed before the special term, and a judgment of foreclosure upon the verdict of the jury and the decision of the special term has been entered, and the property sold; and that no appeal has been taken from the judgment,—the decision of these appeals should stand over until it -shall be determined whether ah appeal is taken from the final judgment. After that event either party has the right to move this court to decide or dismiss these appeals.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.