Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896

Watertown Paper Co. v. West

Watertown Paper Co. v. West
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 10, 1896
73 N.Y. St. Rep. 846

Counsel

J. A. Arnold, for app’lts; 0. De H. Brower, for resp’L

Watertown Paper Co. v. West

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It appears by the affidavit upon which this motion was made that this defendant has not answered or demurred or otherwise moved in reference to the complaint since the-same was served upon him. There is no allegation in the moving-papers that a bill of particulars is necessary to enablé the defendant to prepare his answer; and it is quite evident that it is not, as he can deny, either expressly pr upon information and belief, the-allegations contained in the complaint. We think, therefore, that this motion was prematurely made, aud that, at this stage of the-action, the facts necessary to be alleged and proved were not before the court to justify the granting of a bill of particulars.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements,, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.