Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

Rosskam v. Curtis

Rosskam v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1897
15 A.D. 190; 44 N.Y.S. 198

Counsel

J. W. Atkinson, for the appellant., Thomas O’Connor, for the respondent.

Rosskam v. Curtis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The certificate of the clerk shows that the appeal book contains copies of all the papers filed in his office. The papers whose absence from the appeal book is complained of by the respondent were the papers and proceedings used by him upon the motion. If he has neglected to file them, he should not now be permitted to have the appeal dismissed because of their absence from the appeal hook.

All concurred.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.