Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

Sturz v. Fischer

Sturz v. Fischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1897 · Parker
19 A.D. 198; 45 N.Y.S. 1009

Counsel

Leopold Leo, for the appellant., George S. Hastings, for the respondent.

Sturz v. Fischer

Opinion of the Court

Parker, J. :

This is an action for goods sold and delivered.- As matter of defense the defendant alleged in his answer, and proved' upon the trial, that the plaintiff extended the time of payment of such indebtedness, and to that end accepted defendant’s several notes, the face.value of which aggregated the amount of defendant’s indebtedness ; and that'not one of such notes had matured at the time of the commencement of this action. The -action was, therefore^ prematurely brought. (Martens-Turner Company v. Machintosh, 17 App. Div. 419.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Patterson, Rumsey, O’Brien and Ingraham, J.J., concurred.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, cost to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.