Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

Sawyer v. Badger

Sawyer v. Badger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 12, 1897
44 N.Y.S. 1129 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Percy L. Klock, for appellant., J. A. Hodge, Jr., for respondents.

Sawyer v. Badger

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The rulings of the court upon the several exceptions to the admission and rejection of evidence were correct. The single question presented which requires examination is whether the findings of the trial judge were supported by the evidence. On careful consideration of all the testimony, we are ■of the opinion that the learned judge was justified in coming to the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to prove that the transfer in question was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of Josephine M. Mack. The .judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.