Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

Whitney v. Britton

Whitney v. Britton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 23, 1897 · Parker
45 N.Y.S. 1150 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John H. Clapp, for appellants., E. E. Baldwin, for respondent.

Whitney v. Britton

Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J.

The plaintiff, one of the two children of Elizabeth Lee, supposing that section 2653a of the Code authorized her to maintain a suit for the purpose of determining the validity of the will of said Elizabeth Lee, which devised and bequeathed to the defendants all the *1151estate of the testatrix, commenced this suit and prosecuted it to judgment. In the meantime it has been determined that a person who dods not take under a will is not interested in it within the meaning of that section. Lewis v. Cook, 150 N. Y. 163, 44 N. E. 778. It follows that the judgment must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.