Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

Wright v. Weisel

Wright v. Weisel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 2, 1897
46 N.Y.S. 483; 19 A.D. 630 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Clarence L. Barber, for appellant., Abram Kling, for respondent.

Wright v. Weisel

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from was properly made. Mr. Husted was appointed a receiver by a decree of the court made in this action, and that appointment cannot be revoked, nor the decree modified upon the mere application of a stranger to the action; for, as between the parties to that action, the judgment stands unassailed and unassailable, and, if the petitioner here has acquired any rights in and to the premises adverse or superior to those of the receiver, they must be asserted in the proper, way.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.