Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897

London Assurance Corp. v. King

London Assurance Corp. v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1897
47 N.Y.S. 1140 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

W. W. MacFarland, for appellant., Michael H. Cardozo, for respondent.

London Assurance Corp. v. King

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The question presented in this case is substantially the same as that pre*1141sented in the case of Corporation v. Thompson (decided herewith) 47 N. Y. Supp. 830. For the reasons assigned for the decision in that case, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and judgment directed for the plaintiff against the defendant for his share of one sixteenth of the value of the turpentine in the sheds .of Downing & Co., at Brunswick, Ga., destroyed by fire, and which was covered by the policy issued by the plaintiff; such amount to be ascertained upon the settlement of the judgment upon this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.