Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898

Whipple v. Ripson

Whipple v. Ripson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 1, 1898
29 A.D. 70

Counsel

Herbert J. Stull, for the appellant., William H. Sullivan, for John D. Ripson, respondent., Frederick A. Mann, for William J. Nowack, respondent.

Whipple v. Ripson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The notice of motion recites that it was made on the judgment roll tiled in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe November 27, 1897, and upon certain affidavits. The affidavits do not disclose the issues raised by the. pleadings. The judgment roll, which is the foundation for the motion, and which must have been read in the court below, or regarded as read, is not contained in the record, and the court has no means of knowing what issues were raised by the pleadings, or decided by the court when the case was tried. On appeals from orders all the papers used in the court below must be contained in the record, and all such papers must be referred to in the order disposing of the motion; otherwise an appeal from the order will not be entertained.

Neither party having taken any steps to correct the record or objected thereto, the appeal should he dismissed, without costs to either party.

All concurred.

Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.