Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898

Mayer v. Mayer

Mayer v. Mayer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 20, 1898
51 N.Y.S. 1079 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

I. T. Sackett, for appellant., J. H. Seymour, for respondent.

Mayer v. Mayer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The affidavit upon which the motion for a bill of particulars is based was made by the attorney only. No reason is given why it was not made by the plaintiff. It has often been held that such an affidavit is entirely insufficient to warrant the granting of a bill of particulars. Van Olinda v. Hall, 82 Hun, 357, 31 N. Y. Supp. 495; Gridley v. Gridley, 7 Civ. Proc. R. 215.

For that reason, the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.