Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898

Weber v. Thom

Weber v. Thom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 11, 1898 · Goodrich
52 N.Y.S. 1061 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

W. J. Foster, for appellant., A. H. F. Seeger, for respondent.

Weber v. Thom

Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, P. J.

The plaintiff, as agent of one Edward D. Pier-son, a dealer and shipper of milk, from Orange county to New York City, brings this action under section 29 of the domestic commerce law (5 Rev. St. [9th Ed.] p. 3518), to recover a penalty of $50 for the unlawful use of a milk can belonging to Pierson. The can was in use at premises on Amsterdam avenue, in the city of New York, where a Ferris Wheel was in operation, and was used to contain water to he supplied to the engines. The main question of fact was whether the can was being used by the defendant and his employés, or by his son and his employés. There was contradictory evidence tending to show the ownership and operation of the wheel, and the collection of entrance fees, both by the defendant and his son, as hearing upon the identification of the person using the can; so that the question was one clearly for the consideration of the jury, to whom the court submitted the subject, under a specific and proper direction. The finding of the jury was for the plaintiff, and is not to be disturbed.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.