Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Wieland v. Willcox

Wieland v. Willcox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1899
40 A.D. 213; 57 N.Y.S. 1038

Counsel

John U. Shorter, for the appellant., John H. Parsons, for the respondent.

Wieland v. Willcox

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

Per Curiam:

The previous recovery by the plaintiff for damages for a wrongful discharge from his employment, is a bar to the maintenance of the present action. It is settled law in this State that upon such a discharge the only action the employee can bring 'is for the breach of the contract, and not one for wages on the theory of constructive service. The breach being single, but a single action can be brought on it, and in that action the plaintiff must recover all his damages. (Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362; Weed v. Burt, 78 id. 191; Basset v. French, 31 N. Y. Supp. 667; Waldron v. Hendrickson, ante, p. 7.)

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.