Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Ramsdill v. Swanick

Ramsdill v. Swanick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 21, 1899
60 N.Y.S. 821; 45 A.D. 626 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James F. Swanick, in pro. per., Edgar T. Brackett, for respondent.

Ramsdill v. Swanick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case does not disclose any exception or error of law for which the judgment should be reversed. As to questions of fact, and as to whether the verdict is excessive, we are precluded from examining them, for the reason that the record does not show that any order denying a motion for a new trial was ever entered, nor that the case contains all the evidence that was given upon the trial.

The judgment therefore must be affirmed, with costs.

PUTNAM, J., not acting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.