Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Roberts v. Jenkins

Roberts v. Jenkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
52 A.D. 491; 65 N.Y.S. 385

Counsel

Michael Schaap, for the appellant., Thomas C. Ennever, for the respondent.

Roberts v. Jenkins

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The order denying a motion for a preference of this cause upon the calendar must be affirmed. The pleadings in the action are not in the record, nor is there anything from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the statutory preference claimed. That right cannot be inferred simply from the title of an action.

The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.