Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Faber

Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Faber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
52 A.D. 626; 65 N.Y.S. 1136
Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Faber

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

In this case the same question is presented as in the case of Leonard v. Faber, decided herewith (Ante, p. 495). It arises in the same way and must be determined upon the same considerations. The* judgment should, therefore, be reversed and. a new trial granted, with costs to appellant * to abide event. Van Brunt, P..,: dissented.. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.