Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Faber
Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Faber
52 A.D. 626; 65 N.Y.S. 1136
Opinion of the Court
In this case the same question is presented as in the case of Leonard v. Faber, decided herewith (Ante, p. 495). It arises in the same way and must be determined upon the same considerations. The* judgment should, therefore, be reversed and. a new trial granted, with costs to appellant * to abide event. Van Brunt, P..,: dissented.. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.