Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 1, 1900
54 A.D. 488

Counsel

Thomas J. O'Neill, for the appellant., Wilbur L. Ball, for the respondent.

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

appealed must be us does not contain the pleadings in the action, nor is there anything in it from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the preference- claimed. Such right cannot be inferred solely from the title of the action. (Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 App. Div. 491.)

The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present—-Van Bbunt, P. J., RumseY, Patterson, O’Bbien and McLaughlin, JJ. . .

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.