Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Pinchot v. New York Elevated Railroad

Pinchot v. New York Elevated Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 23, 1900
63 N.Y.S. 489 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Arthur C. Townsend, for appellants., Frederick C. McLaughlin, for respondent.

Pinchot v. New York Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is “from so much of the order * * * entered * * * on the 27th day of February, 1900, as denies defendant’s motion to resettle the order of February 14, 1900, modifying the terms therein imposed.” We assume that what the defendant seeks is a modification of the terms imposed by the original order, but no appeal is taken therefrom, and we do not think that this question can be raised by appeal from so much of a subsequent order as denies the motion for a resettlement of the original order.

The appeal accordingly should be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.