Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Lorch v. Lorch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 9, 1900

63 N.Y.S. 567; 49 A.D. 638 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George W. Albright, for appellant., Greenthal & Greenthal, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think the questions of fact in this case were proper for the jury, and their verdict is not against the weight of evidence; but in view of the occurrences on the trial, and the charge of the court in relation thereto, we think the ends of justice require that there should be a new trial.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, .with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., dissenting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.