Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 23, 1900
66 N.Y.S. 1027 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Thomas J. O’Neill, for appellant., Wilbur L. Ball, for respohdent.

Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be affirmed. The record before us does not contain the pleadings in the action, nor is there anything in it from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the preference claimed. Such right cannot be inferred solely from the title of the action. Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 App. Div. 491, 65 N. Y. Supp. 385.

The order must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.