Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

People ex rel. Leary v. Knox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 9, 1900 · Brien, Hatch, Ingraham

67 N.Y.S. 1142 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Theodore Connoly, for appellant., Abram I. Elkus, for respondent.

INGRAHAM, J.

For the reasons stated in the case of People v. Knox (Sup.) 66 N. Y. Supp. 984, the order appealed from is reversed, and motion denied, with costs.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

HATCH, J.

For the reasons stated in my opinion in People v. Knox (Sup.) 66 N. Y. Supp. 984, I concur with Mr. Justice INGRAHAM.

O’BRIEN, J.

For the reasons stated in my opinion in People v. Knox (Sup.) 66 N. Y. Supp. 984, I dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.