Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Upson v. Hesselson

Upson v. Hesselson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 4, 1901 · Rumsey
69 N.Y.S. 684 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Gustavus A. Rogers, for appellant., Francis J. McLoughlin, for respondent.

Upson v. Hesselson

Opinion of the Court

RUMSEY, J.

The appellant has not seen fit to print the summons and complaint in this action, and we have no other information with respect to the cause of action than is given by the affidavits. Mr. Upson testifies that the action is actually entitled, “William Ford Upson; Receiver of Engel, Heller & Co., Plaintiff, against Simon Hesselson, Defendant,” and that he has brought the suit in his own right individually, and not in his right as receiver. That being so, the defendant clearly was not entitled to an order requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs.

For that reason, this order must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.