Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Brock v. Surpless

Brock v. Surpless
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1901
72 N.Y.S. 831; 66 A.D. 609 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Randolph Parmly (Frederick E. Kessinger, on the brief), for appellant., Ellis E. Aldrich, for respondents.

Brock v. Surpless

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendants have procured an order compelling the plaintiff to produce for the defendants’ inspection the account books of a foreign corporation not a party to the action. The plaintiff, under oath, denies custody, possession, control, power, authority, or right to the books, and avers that they are in the possession, custody, and control of the secretary of the company, whom he names, pursuant to resolution of the board of directors. These allegations are unrefuted. The defendants’ counsel admits in his brief that “after an exhaustive research” he can find no authority in point. The case of Martine v. Albro, 26 Hun, 559, related1 to books which were in the defendants’ undisputed possession, and which they had already produced for inspection, pursuant to a prior order. As the order appealed from herein relates to books not within the terms of section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to possession or control, either literally or constructively, it must be reversed, and the motion denied.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.