Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902

Remsen v. Hyams

Remsen v. Hyams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 7, 1902
78 N.Y.S. 1134 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles W. Coleman, for appellant. William R. Wilder, for respondents.

Remsen v. Hyams

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think that the case of Hahl v. Sugo, 169 N. Y. 116, 62 N. E. 135, is an express authority for the granting of this motion. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.