Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Begen v. Curtis

Begen v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1903
81 A.D. 91; 80 N.Y.S. 929

Counsel

Edwin L. Ford, for the plaintiff., I. M. Pettus, for the defendants.

Begen v. Curtis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The proposed submission in this case contains no agreement as to the facts which are admitted and form the subject of the alleged submission. Opposite the title there is a memorandum to the effect that it is a case agreed upon in a controversy submitted without action, pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure.- That does not form any part of the submission, but is merely descriptive.

And, furthermore, it is not stated that the case agreed upon contains a statement of the facts as required by the Code (§ 1219). There is no stipulation whatever between the parties that the papers constitute a case containing a statement of the facts which has been agreed upon.

The submission must, therefore, be dismissed, with leave to file a new. submission.

Present — Tan Brunt, P. J., C’Brien, Ingraham, McLaughlin and Laughlin, JJ.

Submission dismissed, with leave to file new .submission.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.