Church v. Church
Opinion of the Court
We think that this judgment must ¡be reversed for the refusal of the trial court to grant a postponement upon the motion of the plaintiff. The affidavit for a postponement shows that there were numerous witnesses outside of the county of Fulton who were necessary and material for the' plaintiff upon the trial of this action Which the plaintiff had been unable to procure. In the affidavit is included the usual affidavit of merits and the usual case made for a postponement of the trial. It is true that, one of. the witnesses claimed to be a necessary and material witnessi was produced there by the- defendant, but the affidavit specifies other witnesses whose testimony is material to the plaintiff.
With this disposal of the judgment, it is probably unnecessary to determine the appeal from the order declining to settle the issuea for a jury trial. If there had been a waiver for the purpose of a, trial upon the adjourned day upon which it was tried, that waiver would hardly be applied where other good and sufficient reason existed for postponing the trial from the day upon which it waa consented that the trial should be had. The judgment should be-reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to plaintiff- to abide event.
All concurred.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant: to abide event, and order modified so as to provide leave for renewal of motion to' settle issues, and as so modified affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.