Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Maglio v. New York Herald Co.

Maglio v. New York Herald Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1903
83 A.D. 44; 82 N.Y.S. 509

Counsel

Robert W. Candler [Willimn Jay with him on the brief], for the appellant., Charles A. Dryer, for the respondents.

Maglio v. New York Herald Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We agree with the learned counsel for the appellant that the alleged libel refers to the property of the plaintiffs and not to the plaintiffs individually, and that it is, therefore, necessary to allege special damage in order to maintain the action. We are of opinion, however, that there is a sufficient allegation of special damage in the statement that the plaintiffs’ hotel property has become depreciated in value by reason of the publication. This is enough to sustain the complaint.

Goodrich, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward, Hirschberg and PIooker, JJ., concurred.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.