Meyer v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
The action appears to have been commenced in December, 1901, and the defendant failed to answer or demur. Judgment was entered by default on January 15, 1902, and execiition
We have uniformly held that a motion to open a default upon the pleadings will not be granted unless a copy of the proposed pleadings is served with the motion papers; and there is no reason why this, rule should not be applied to the city of New York as well as to other litigants. Before a default should be opened it must appear that there is a substantial issue to be tried; and it is quite essential, in determining that question, that the pleadings proposed by the party in default should be before the court. In this case the judgment was entered almost five months before the motion was made, and there is no suggestion but that the defendant had ample time to prepare the proposed answer and serve it with the motion papers. For this reason we think the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, with leave to the defendant to renew the motion on payment of such costs. All concur.
1. See Judgment, vol. 30, Cent. Dig. § 317.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.