Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Roux v. Rothschild

Roux v. Rothschild
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 16, 1903 · Ingraham
79 N.Y.S. 1145 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry M. Stevenson, for appellant., George W. Betts, Jr., for respondent.

Roux v. Rothschild

Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, J.

The question presented in this case is the same as that in Rothschild v. Roux (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 833. The facts are stated in that case; this action being brought to set aside the powers of attorney and transfers of various installments of annuities to which the plaintiff xvas entitled under the will of his grandfather. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.