Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady

H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 13, 1903 · Ingraham
84 N.Y.S. 1130 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Moses Weinman, for appellants., Emanual J. Myers, for respondents.

H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady

Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, J.

A statement of the proceeding which has resulted in this judgment, and the nature of the judgment, are stated in a former appeal in this action. 82 App. Div. 279, 81 N. Y. Supp. 695. Entertaining the views there expressed, it is quite apparent that a judgment, so far as it affects appellant Doelger or directs a sale of his property, was unauthorized, and that for the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment, so far as it affects appellant Doelger, should be reversed, and all provisions in the judgment by which it is adjudged that the plaintiffs acquire a lien upon the premises described in the complaint and directing a sale of the property, should be stricken from the judgment appealed from, with costs to the said appellant against the respondents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.