Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Hall v. Gerken

Hall v. Gerken
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 13, 1904
89 N.Y.S. 171; 96 A.D. 632 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William G. McCrea, for appellant., Lemuel Skidmore, for respondent.

Hall v. Gerken

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order in this case is too broad, and requires-particulars to be stated with which the defendant evidently cannot make compliance. The order should be modified by requiring the defendant to state between what dates he suffered loss of profits by reason of the plaintiff’s acts, and the aggregate amount thereof; "and, as sq modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.