Hall v. Gerken
Hall v. Gerken
89 N.Y.S. 171; 96 A.D. 632
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The order in this case is too broad, and requires-particulars to be stated with which the defendant evidently cannot make compliance. The order should be modified by requiring the defendant to state between what dates he suffered loss of profits by reason of the plaintiff’s acts, and the aggregate amount thereof; "and, as sq modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.