Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Ingersoll v. Weld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1905

101 A.D. 365; 91 N.Y.S. 1037

Counsel

Thomas F. Byrne, for the appellant., Albert Stickney, Jr., for the plaintiffs, respondents., Duncan Edwards, for the defendants, respondents.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This-motion was unnecessary. The' moving party is a. party to the action, and as such is entitled to notice of all proceedings in the *366action before.the referee or before the court, and to appear and protect any interest he may have, affected by the proceedings before the referee or before the court. .

■ The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars' costs ■ and disbursements.

Present— Van' Brunt, P. J., Patterson, O’Brien, Hatch and Laugh lin, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.