Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Virden v. Thomas

Virden v. Thomas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 7, 1905 · McLaughlin
92 N.Y.S. 996; 103 A.D. 606 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frank Brundage, for appellant., Charles A. Brodek, for respondent.

Virden v. Thomas

Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, J.

The defendant Thomas appeals from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of New *997York to the county of Wayne. The facts set out in the record bearing upon the question of the change of place of trial are precisely the same as in Washington v. Thomas (decided herewith) 92 N. Y. Supp. 994, and for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in that case the order here appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, to abide event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.