Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Polhemus v. Polhemus

Polhemus v. Polhemus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 6, 1905
95 N.Y.S. 325; 108 A.D. 353 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James Parker, for appellants., Henry Wilson Bridges, for respondent.

Polhemus v. Polhemus

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that under the authority of Flynn v. Brooklyn City Railway Co., 9 App. Div. 269, 41 N. Y. Supp. 566, affirmed 158 N. Y. 493, 53 N. E. 520; Fitchett v. Murphy, 46 App. Div. 181, 61 N. Y. Supp. 182, and Greaves v. Gouge, 69 N. Y. 154, this action was prematurely brought. There is no allegation in the complaint, and no proof was made upon the trial, that the plaintiff applied to the corporation to commence the action, or that it had refused to prosecute or unreasonably delayed the commencement of the action. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.