Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Vincent v. Onderdonk

Vincent v. Onderdonk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 29, 1905
95 N.Y.S. 347; 107 A.D. 626 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Augustus Van Wyck (Edward J. McGuire, on the brief), for appellant., William W. Gillen, for respondent. •

Vincent v. Onderdonk

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that under the doctrine of Garby v. Bennett, 40 App. Div. 163, 57 N. Y. Supp. 853, affirmed 166 N. Y. 392, 59 N. E. 1117, the case presented a question for the jury.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial be granted; costs to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.