Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Iaquinto v. Bauer

Iaquinto v. Bauer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 20, 1905
95 N.Y.S. 469 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William P. Maloney, for the motion., Charles C. Nadal, opposed.

Iaquinto v. Bauer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The motion for reargument is denied, without costs. The index in the record refers to a specified page for the stipulation. This had been printed in the case at that page, but appeared as canceled by pen mark. We therefore concluded that it was out of. the record. We did not notice the undistinguished line and a half on a different page at the close of the case that the case did contain all of the evidence, nor was our attention called to it in the record or orally. We have reconsidered the case in view of the stipulation, and we think that the evidence does not warrant a reversal of the order denying the motion made for a new trial under section 977 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.